|
|
Post by destiny on Mar 24, 2010 21:08:00 GMT -5
Yay, here's a thank you from me too. She's very good!  |
|
|
|
Post by Ten on Mar 24, 2010 22:18:20 GMT -5
"Oh, I'm not saying we always get these things right, but we try to the best of our ability."
--
That's not enough. Not being omniscient, we do not have all the evidence to know all of a person's actions and their state of mind and heart at the time and in the present. Therefore, we cannot (with accuracy) judge others as good or evil. Actions, yes. Souls, no.
|
|
|
|
Post by duckyaisha on Mar 27, 2010 5:34:25 GMT -5
I guess you're right, Ten.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ten on Mar 27, 2010 11:52:37 GMT -5
o-o Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cloud on Mar 28, 2010 19:45:19 GMT -5
xD You seem so surprised, O numeric one.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ten on Mar 30, 2010 19:17:16 GMT -5
I am. This sort of thing is difficult to prove one way or another.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cloud on Mar 31, 2010 18:44:14 GMT -5
You should know by now that you're good at proving things. Morality things as well.
No, proving things to wishers doesn't count because the majority of those people have rocks for brains when it comes to warriors.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ten on Apr 1, 2010 17:18:56 GMT -5
It's easier to prove a point when I have examples and evidence. Since I can't convince many wishers of anything in situations where proof is easy to understand and easy to come by, I didn't expect I'd have any better luck with fewer tools available. And even if you mean they have rocks for brains in regards to functions other than reading and typing, they remember a lot of details about numerous characters.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cloud on Apr 1, 2010 23:22:40 GMT -5
I meant when it comes to arguments about warriors.
|
|
