|
Post by sage on Jan 20, 2009 17:04:09 GMT -5
True. Like if part of it is rocky, or even a dried little stream where water rarely fills, and if it does - etc.
Like instead of having a forum named Hunting Grounds, why not having a title called Hunting Grounds, then list some specifics? That would make the less general setting easier to describe..... -thinks-
|
|
|
Post by Ten on Jan 21, 2009 20:37:14 GMT -5
"the setting doesn't say what each of the 'areas' (the three roleplaying boards) are like." --x Because they're all the same.
"Like if part of it is rocky," --x That would be all of it.
"or even a dried little stream where water rarely fills," --x Hm. This is a possibility. There could be a low spot, a sort of thin tributary to a stream, with moistened dust and on occation something more than a trickle.
"Like instead of having a forum named Hunting Grounds, why not having a title called Hunting Grounds, then list some specifics?" --x Like what? This is where animals kill other animals to eat them? Because that's what it is. It's not a specific place. It's an interaction category.
|
|